Integrity Commission will require bipartisanship and consultation to be effective

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Integrity Commission will require bipartisanship and consultation to be effective

In order for the proposed National Integrity Commission to be functional and effective, it will require proper consultation, collaboration and bipartisanship.

While there exist differences between the Coalition and ALP’s respective positions on the look and feel of the National Integrity Commission, the implementation of an appropriate model will require careful consideration, Law Council of Australia president Arthur Moses said.

Such consideration must include input from key stakeholders, legal experts and the community, and the Law Council looks forward to working towards an effective bipartisan solution, he posited.

“While the Law Council steadfastly opposes the inclusion of judicial oversight by a national integrity commission, the focus must be to ensure any federal body has the correct balance of powers to investigate corruption, but also protects the rights of individuals,” Mr Moses said.

“When you get the balance wrong, it may result in the abuse of power and reputations being unfairly damaged with lives destroyed. There are difficulties with both models that are being proposed by the Coalition and the ALP, which we will work through after the Federal election.”

LCA hopes and expects, Mr Moses continued, that any further debate on this important step to combat corruption will be “conducted respectfully with the rule of law at the front of the mind”, leaving rhetoric aside, he said.


“Nobody, including retired judges or politicians, should throw allegations around in order to impugn the motives of those who disagree with their model,” he posited.

“If we work together and not attack each other, we will come up with the best model that will fight corruption, but also not trample on the rights of individuals.”

Mr Moses also reiterated LCA’s call for the establishment of separate a federal judicial commission to oversee complaints against judges.

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy

Jerome Doraisamy is a senior writer for Lawyers Weekly and Wellness Daily at Momentum Media.

Jerome is an admitted solicitor in New South Wales and, prior to joining the team in early 2018, he worked in both commercial and governmental legal roles and has worked as a public speaker and consultant to law firms, universities and high schools across the country and internationally. He is also the author of The Wellness Doctrines self-help book series and is an adjunct lecturer at the University of Western Australia.

Jerome graduated from the University of Technology, Sydney with a Bachelor of Laws and Bachelor of Arts in Communication (Social Inquiry).

You can email Jerome at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Recommended by Spike Native Network