find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Sotomayor's questioning now under scrutiny

Sotomayor's questioning now under scrutiny

Despite some questions suggesting the contrary, senators at the judicial committee questioning of Supreme Court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor, undertook extensive study to prepare for the three day inquisition.

DESPITE some questions suggesting the contrary, senators at the judicial committee questioning of Supreme Court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor, undertook extensive study to prepare for the three day inquisition.

The study was the result of almost one in three senators on the committee having no legal qualifications, reports The National Law Journal.

A medical doctor, a satirist and the owner of the National Basketball Association's Milwaukee Bucks, were just some of the professions represented by the senators, however before asking questions of President Barack Obama’s nominee, Sotomayor, those senators made sure they were up to speed by reading and spending a lot of time with lawyers they have on staff.

"Where we come up short is the language of lawyers," said Senator Chuck Grassley, a farmer by profession who's been in Congress since 1975.

Members on the committee also included a medical doctor, a satirist and the owner of the National Basketball Association's Milwaukee Bucks.

"That's our shortcoming. So, I think that what we have to do is spend more time with our legislative assistants, to ask more questions -probably very simple questions - but we've got to understand the language of lawyers, and we've got to study the cases to a greater extent maybe than the average lawyer."

Grassley said he read summaries, prepared by staff, of some of Sotomayor's cases from her 17 years as a district and appellate judge, as well as legal commentary that he came across in newspapers.

In all, six of the committee's 19 members were nonlawyers, including two of its senior members, Grassley and Senator Herb Kohl. That ratio of almost one in three was significantly higher than it's been in other recent confirmation battles. 

About one in five members did not have a law degree during the hearings for other chief justices such as Justice John Roberts Jr., Justice Samuel Alito Jr., Justice Clarence Thomas and failed nominee Robert Bork.

Kohl, the Bucks owner and a retail magnate, prepared for Sotomayor's hearing in part by convening a group of Wisconsin legal experts at Marquette University Law School. Senator Al Franken said in his opening statement that he's been "consulting with some of Minnesota's top legal minds" after spending the past three decades as an author, radio personality, and writer and performer for Saturday Night Live.

Despite the rigorous preparations for the questioning, Republicans joined Democrats in praising Sotomayor’s demeanor and thoughtfulness, even as some expressed frustration that she had not fully answered their questions.

"You've been great during this process," Senator Orrin Hatch told the 55-year-old judge. While committee chairman, Senator Patrick Leahy, praised her "intelligence, grace and patience".

Whether or not the cordial ending of three days of grilling will translate into more than a handful of Republican votes for Sotomayor is unclear, however, confirmation seems assured, as Republicans pledged not to dispute her nomination. 

A committee vote is likely to come before the end of July, and if followed soon by a vote of the full Senate, Sotomayor could easily join the Court before September 9.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Sotomayor's questioning now under scrutiny
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...