Tiffanys mad over H&M's class

By The New Lawyer|04 March 2013

The store made famous by Audrey Hepburn is furious that H&M may ruin its reputation.

Is it acceptable to sell $5 underpants next door to a jeweller offering $100,000 diamond rings? Tiffany & Co doesn't think so, but Australian shopping centre Westfield does. 


The jeweller and mega shopping centre are locked in a battle over whether the close proximity of the proposed H&M store will damage Tiffany's reputation. 


Now an American judge is to settle the dispute after Tiffany sued Westfield in an effort to stop the opening of a Swedish retailer H&M store in its shopping mall in Los Angeles. 


Advertisement
Advertisement

Tiffany says its contract with Westfield protects its from retailers "whose merchandise and/or price points are not considered to be luxury, upscale or better by conventional retail industry standards" from opening up in its proximity. 


The Westfield store currently holds high-end stores including Louis Vuitton, Coach, Hugo Boss and Cole Haan, but also has a lower-end chains Gap, Bebe and some fast food outlets. 


Tiffanys mad over H&M's class
Intro image
lawyersweekly logo
The Bar

latest

Solicitor calls for government to provide more support for charity gifts in wills

High Court Chief Justice recounts divergence of common law

CPE Capital advised on acquisition of Banksmeadow processing facility

Orora Limited sells Australasian Fibre Business for $1.72bn