find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Property Lawyer
Category: Property Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· 12 Month Contract · Diverse Work
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Infrastructure Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Perth WA
· We'd be particularly interested to hear from you if you were a lawyer who knows your way around the infrastructure and energy sectors.
View details
National judiciary sparks debate

National judiciary sparks debate

The federal opposition has drawn a line in the sand on the idea of a national judiciary, saying the idea if "profoundly antifederal" that would be dominated by the Commonwealth.

THE federal opposition has drawn a line in the sand on the idea of a national judiciary, saying the idea if "profoundly antifederal" that would be dominated by the Commonwealth. 

In a Senate debate yesterday, George Brandis, Queensland Shadow Attorney General, said that while he welcomed the idea of greater harmonisation and further fostering of judicial collegiality through inter-court exchanges, a complete national harmonisation was not supported by the Opposition. 

Brandis' comments came after Chief Justice of New South Wales, James Spigelman, this week called for the creation of a nationally integrated judiciary. 

Brandis said the parliament should be very slow to embrace calls for an integrated national judiciary. 

"The Australian judicial system reflects the federal nature of our polity. The fact that there are state and territory supreme courts with particular jurisdictions, which are quite separate from although often overlapping with the jurisdiction of the federal courts under chapter 3 of the Constitution, is an important feature of our system. 

"May I say on behalf of the opposition, and in this we share the view of the committee, that I would be very slow and sorry to see the autonomy of state supreme courts and territory supreme courts eroded by the integration of those courts into a uniform national judiciary, which would inevitably be dominated by the federal judicial system, by Commonwealth courts."

However, the Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee, in its newly released report Australia's judicial system and the role of judges, was careful to distinguish between a national judicial system and a national court system. 

The Committee noted that existing legislation limits the scope to implement a national judiciary because State and Territory judges are prohibited by The Constitution from acting in a federal capacity. 

It notes that the Federal Court has observed: "'There are many instances of Federal Court judges holding commissions as members of the Supreme Courts of the Territories and, occasionally, as acting judges of State courts', but that a reciprocal arrangement cannot happen under present constitutional arrangements."

As well, in July 2008 the Standing Committee of Attorneys General agreed to establish a working group to examine the feasibility of establishing a national judiciary. 

But the Committee said that support for the development of a national judicial framework is constrained by the likelihood of it facing significant challenges. "The Committee is cautious about what can be achieved through a national judiciary," it said. 

It said it was "not as pessimistic as the Law Council" on the subject, but agrees with the Law Council that "the practical issues of a judicial exchange scheme will need to be very carefully considered to ensure that any system is effective and efficient". 

"While there are potential benefits to litigants and to the administration of justice," it said, as the Law Council notes, "the dangers of weakening the system and undermining confidence in the judiciary are real". 

But, the Committee said it supported the Attorney General's Department and SCAG consideration of progressing arrangements for improved judicial exchange and, eventually, the establishment of a national judiciary. 

In addition to the constitutional reform needed for state judges to work in the federal jurisdiction, there are other complications. As the International Commission of Jurists - Victoria said in its submission to the Committee: "Such a step would not be straightforward. 

"The history of each of the Australian States has resulted in the development of six or more similar but separate systems. In some cases those systems have been tailored to cope with the particular needs or requirements of particular jurisdictions. Ultimately, however, the ICJ supports a national judicial system and supports a trend in that direction."

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

National judiciary sparks debate
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
Nov 16 2017
From lawyer in law firm to senior governance professional
Promoted by Governance Institute of Australia As a law graduate, Kate Griffiths never imagined...
marriage equality
Nov 16 2017
Legislation the next hurdle for marriage equality
Lawyers have underscored the importance of ensuring same-sex marriage legislation does not limit ant...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...