find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Competition, Policy & Regulatory
Category: Other | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Work with a well regarded Partner · Sydney CBD
View details
Commercial Litigation Senior Associate
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Lawyers Weekly Australia Partner of the Year 2016, Insolvency
View details
MULTIPLEX Regional Legal Counsel (Vic) | 7 to 10 years + PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Career defining in-house role · Tier One international contractor
View details
Junior Lawyer - Personal Injury Law
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Parramatta & Western Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Highly specialized practice · Challenging role with great opportunities
View details
IR Advisor/Member Advocate
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: St Leonards NSW 2065
· Permanent (0.8-1.0 FTE) role in a developing team
View details
Judge in favour of Middletons in Gullen Range case

Judge in favour of Middletons in Gullen Range case

Law firm Middletons saw victory in the Land and Environment Court on Friday as the Court approved the construction and operation of its client Epuron's 73 turbine wind farm on the Gullen Range.

LAW firm Middletons saw victory in the Land and Environment Court on Friday as the court approved the construction and operation of its client Epuron’s 73 turbine wind farm on the Gullen Range.

Middletons acted for Gullen Range Wind Farm, a subsidiary of Epuron, in its successful defence of an objector's appeal against the Minister's approval of one of the New South Wales’ larger wind farms.

The Gullen Range Wind Farm could supply renewable energy for up to 73,500 average NSW homes and reduce gas emissions in the state by up to 588,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum.

Middletons' senior associate, Antoinette Migliorino said of the case: "The Court approved the wind farm project finding that the overall impact of the project on the public and individual landowners was acceptable, and made numerous findings dealing with some highly contentious issues raised by wind farm opponents and recently the NSW Legislative Council."

A local objectors group comprising around 40 landowners, as well an individual landowner, had commenced two appeals against the project in August 2009. They were seeking refusal of the entire project or alternatively some form of acquisition or monetary compensation.

Migliorino said: "The court undertook the enormous task of assessing the visual, noise and shadow flicker impacts on around 30 individual properties and numerous public viewpoints - ultimately concluding that the proponent be given the option of either acquiring 13 properties (5 more than required by the Minister's original approval) or alternatively deleting a number of turbines."

Migliorino said the case is "a major win for wind farm proponents in NSW".

"The court held that the Development Control Plan (DCP) requiring a 2km setback of turbines from any dwelling was not a relevant consideration for this form of development. If such a condition was applied a large number of turbines would have been arbitrarily deleted from the project.

"Numerous demands by surrounding landowners seeking monetary compensation for alleged devaluation of their properties were unequivocally rejected by the court (the Chief Judge's views in RES Southern Cross v Minister for Planning were adopted).

"Contrary to the requirements of the DCP, the court clarified the basis upon which community contributions should be calculated in this case – that is, based upon the number of turbines constructed rather than the local Council's preference for a contribution based upon generation output capacity."

Senior Commissioner Moore and Commissioner Fakes delivered their 180 page Judgment on Friday morning, last week. The parties now will formulate conditions of consent based upon the Judgment. The proceedings are next before the court on 27 May 2010.

Middletons is the only law firm to have been involved in all wind farm appeal proceedings in NSW.



Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Judge in favour of Middletons in Gullen Range case
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Handshake
Sep 20 2017
Silk picked to monitor national security laws
Dr James Renwick SC has been appointed as Independent National Security Legislation Monitor after se...
Two businessman, growth
Sep 19 2017
Aus catching up on international arbitration front
Australia is starting to see a spike in international arbitration with this set to continue over the...
Prison
Sep 19 2017
Manson family killer suffered ‘miscarriage of justice’: former lawyer
A retired Australian barrister has published a book on the Manson Family murders of 1969 and called ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...