find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Victorian lawyers warn of endless litigation

Victorian lawyers warn of endless litigation

Victorian lawyers have warned of rising court costs and endless litigation should double jeopardy be eliminated in the state.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Victorian lawyers have warned of rising court costs and endless litigation should double jeopardy be eliminated in the state. 

The legal rule of double jeopardy in Victoria will beoverhauled, allowing some people to be tried for the same crime, if the opposition wins power at November’s state election.  

Under a Ted Baillieu-led government, a person committed of a serious crime could face a second trial if they admit guilt, if new DNA evidence is found, or if a key witness confesses to giving false evidence. 

The double jeopardy rule, which applies in Victoria, stops a person being tried more than once for the same crime. But the state's Attorney General, Robert Clark, has said occasion do arise when a retrial should be allowed, thereby flagging a change.

The peak body representing the Victorian legal profession has asked the state opposition to “exercise caution” in considering the proposal to revoke the law, should it win the election.  

The Law Institute of Victoria warned the change couldlead to slipshod justice. 

“The rule ensures members of the public brought to trial can be sure that once their case is decided, and if they are proven innocent, they can get on with their lives instead of being open to endless retrials,” LIV president Steven Stevens said. 

Stevens said the rule also ensures that police and prosecutors cannot “repeatedly put forward shoddy, cobbled together cases safe in the knowledge that if they get it wrong this time they can simply put forward another shoddy case whenever they like”. 

According to the Victorian legal profession, the current double jeopardy laws protect those accused of crimes, but also give the alleged victims the assurance that they will have a final resolution. 

“The prospect of endless hearings and rehearings is of no benefit to anyone,” Stevens said. 

Stevens also said an end to double jeopardy would add significantly to the cost of justice in Victoria, which would come at the expense of areas of need such as legal aid for the public. 

“Contrary to some views, lawyers are not interested in endless court cases, they are interested in justice. An end to double jeopardy would open the floodgates ofrepeated legal proceedings which would drain our already overstretched courts. The Law Institute of Victoria is opposed to this.” 

Stevens called on the State government to maintain its support for double jeopardy and resist any temptation to get into a bidding war with the opposition in an attempt to “look tough on crime”. 

“The government is consistently on the record as supporting the principle of double jeopardy and the LIV calls on it to maintain this principled position,” Stevens said. 

“The principle of double jeopardy is also part of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities introduced by the Brumby government and the LIV expects thegovernment will maintain its support for this important legal principle.”    
Victorian lawyers warn of endless litigation
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...