find the latest legal job
Monash University Director Workplace Relations
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Exceptional senior leadership role
View details
Personal Injury Lawyer - Melbourne Eastern Suburbs - 2-5 years PAE
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Lilydale VIC 3140
· Fulfilling role as part of a small team in a positive workplace
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· In-house opportunity · Be part of our engine for success in a high growth business
View details
Trainer/Assessor Diploma of Legal Services
Category: Other | Location: Liverpool NSW 2170
· 3 Days Per Week · 9am - 4pm
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Adelaide CBD · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
Exclusive: Proxies will count at incorporation ballot

Exclusive: Proxies will count at incorporation ballot

Opponents of incorporation have made an unsuccessful attempt to exclude over 200 proxy votes from a ballot on whether barristers are allowed to practise through single-member corporate entities.

In an email seen by Lawyers Weekly, Arthur Moses SC and Anne Healey of Sydney’s Frederick Jordan Chambers challenged the validity of proxy votes in determining the right of barristers to incorporate.

Three senior silks had previously sent an open letter urging members to appoint Bar Councillor John Hyde Page (pictured) from 5 Selborne Chambers as a proxy and direct him to vote in favour of the motion.

Hyde Page revealed to Lawyers Weekly that more than 200 proxy votes supporting the motion have already been cast.

But Moses and Healey argued that the proxy form did not accurately describe the motion that would be before the meeting.

The barristers also commented that member proxies were being sought before the issue of incorporation had been the subject of advice and members had been given the benefit of that advice. They referred to minutes of a Bar Council meeting in June that stated: “The Bar Council resolved to commission a legal opinion from a senior member or members of the Bar about the consequences of barristers providing their services through single-member corporate entities.”

Moses and Healey recommended that any decision on this issue or the appointment of a proxy await the receipt of commissioned advices.

“The issue of incorporation is a matter that requires consideration based on the facts of the law,” the email stated.

In a memo dated 23 August, NSW Bar Association president Philip Boulten SC, who has consistently opposed moves for incorporation since Hyde Page first floated the idea, encouraged members to read advices before casting a proxy. He also offered barristers an opportunity to withdraw or amend an existing proxy, but did not disqualify the proxy votes that had already been cast.

Hyde Page said the move by opponents of incorporation to potentially exclude more than 200 of their colleagues from the ballot was uncalled for.

“I don’t think that sort of behaviour has any place at the NSW Bar,” he added.

Barrister Geoffrey Slater of Melbourne’s Seabrook Chambers, an advocate of incorporation, launched a website called Barristers Incorporation ‘YES’ Vote Campaign on Friday (23 August) to provide an online facility for members to make proxies.

Members will vote on the motion calling for individual barristers to be permitted to offer legal services through a single-member, sole-director company formed under the Corporations Act 2001 at a general meeting of the Bar Association on Tuesday 17 September.


Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network