find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
How we nailed a serial killer

How we nailed a serial killer

Almost two decades after the historic trial of Ivan Milat, the junior counsel at the time has released a book detailing the tactics used by the prosecution to convict the killer.

Dan Howard SC, who is also the president of the NSW Mental Health Review Tribunal, has published a book called R v Milat: A Case Study in Cross-Examination, which offers a blow-by-blow account of the cross-examination of Milat by crown prosecutor Mark Tedeshci QC, accompanied by a critical analysis of his techniques.

Ivan Milat was sentenced to seven consecutive life sentences without parole for the brutal murder of seven young backpackers in 1996.

The discovery of the stabbed and bullet-ridden bodies in Belanglo State Forest, NSW in 1992-93 prompted the most intensive manhunt in Australian history.

It was only through the combined efforts of the police and the prosecution that the man responsible was finally put behind bars.

An exemplar for future advocates

Lawyers Weekly attended the book launch held at the offices of the Law Society of NSW last week (14 August).

At the launch, Howard said his book preserved the skills, knowledge and quality of advocacy that Tedeshci demonstrated during the trial.

“Having analysed it critically and thoroughly as a much older a wiser man, I’m still in awe of what a first-rate cross-examination it was,” said Howard.

“If you want to see examples, you’ll have to buy the book, but don’t think you can buy the book and be safely cross-examined by Mark. He’s got many more tricks up his sleeve.”

Hoping for a few hints, Lawyers Weekly spoke to Tedeschi. He said the key message that young lawyers should take away from the book was the importance of “focusing and sticking to the point”.

“I see so many cross-examinations ramble on and I can’t see what the point is, the jury can’t see what the point is and the judge can’t see what the point is, and, at the end of the day, the jury has to see what you’re getting at fairly soon or you’re not going to achieve anything.”

According to Tedeschi, cross-examination is crucial in a criminal trial because it gives jury members the opportunity to form their own view of whether the accused is being “forthright, open, cooperative and honest” or “evasive and lacking in credibility”.

The format of the book is completely unique, said Nicholas Cowdery QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions at the time of the trial.

“This is the only example that any of us can think of where a single cross-examination of a single accused person on trial has been the subject of such close critical examination,” he said.

“It is a large task to digest the detail of this book. It’s not something you pick up for five or ten minutes of relaxation in an idle moment. You really have to apply yourself and, if you do, you will benefit enormously.

“It’s something that will be of very great value to professional advocates and to law students.”

A spokesperson from publisher LexisNexis said there was a great deal of excitement surrounding the title and that the book was so popular it had to be reprinted before it was officially launched.

Why prosecutors can’t be too human

The book launch had a mixed air of eerie reunion and celebration. 

It brought together the solicitors, prosecutors and police officers who cracked the case, many of whom had not seen each other in years.

The speakers took the opportunity to reflect on the tragic nature of the case, which continued to rouse so much emotion even 18 years after the trial.

“As much as a prosecutor has to not be emotional, you couldn’t help, as a human being, being very much affected by the tragedy, by the intensity of the trial,” said Howard.

The hardest part was placing victims’ families at a distance. “Throughout the long months of the trial, one wanted to embrace and hug [them],” he said.

The problem, according to Tedeschi, was that the formality, objectivity and professionalism demanded by a court of law promoted a certain “dispassionate approach to cases.”

“A lot of victims find that very frustrating,” he said. But, without this sense of detachment, miscarriages of justice were more likely to occur.

Howard said that he began writing the book in the first year after the trial but “it was too raw, the emotion was still there”. It was only after a very long gestation that the book finally came together.

“There is insufficient acknowledgement given to the accumulation of emotional stress and sadness that can affect, and at times overwhelm [advocates],” he added.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

How we nailed a serial killer
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...