find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Cunneen loses bid to stop ICAC probe

Cunneen loses bid to stop ICAC probe

The NSW Supreme Court has ruled that crown prosecutor Margaret Cunneen SC will have to front a public inquiry over allegations that she intended to pervert the course of justice.

The NSW Supreme Court has ruled that crown prosecutor Margaret Cunneen SC will have to front a public inquiry over allegations that she intended to pervert the course of justice.

In a decision handed down today, Supreme Court Justice Clifton Hoeben found that the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) can proceed with a public inquiry into allegations that Cunneen (pictured) advised her son’s girlfriend, Sophia Tilley, to “pretend to have chest pains” to avoid being breath-tested after being involved in a car accident.

Justice Hoeben held that “interference with an investigation with the intention to deflect criminal or disciplinary action can amount to perverting the course of justice or an attempt to pervert the course of justice”.

While the judge admitted that ICAC does infringe on “fundamental rights”, he maintained that defining corrupt conduct should not be “unnecessarily read down”.

“In this case, the allegations could be used to satisfy both limbs of the definition of corrupt conduct in the ICAC Act,” stated a summary of Justice Hoeben’s 55-page judgment.

Lawyers Weekly attempted to speak with Cunneen after the decision had been handed down, but she declined to comment. Cunneen has since lodged a second appeal.

The appeal is listed for hearing before the Court of Appeal on Tuesday 18 November. ICAC told the Court of Appeal that it would not commence the public inquiry until the appeal was determined.

ICAC was due to commence its three-day inquiry this morning, but it was delayed when Cunneen sought an injunction to force ICAC to drop its investigation and public inquiry.

Cunneen’s barrister, Arthur Moses SC, made a number of submissions, including that ICAC had overstepped its jurisdiction because the public interest in exposing the matter did not outweigh the interest in preserving Cunneen’s privacy.

Under section 31 of the ICAC Act, the watchdog must take into account whether a matter is in the public interest and the seriousness of the allegations before launching a public inquiry.

Moses also claimed that there was no suggestion the allegations were related to Cunneen’s conduct as a crown prosecutor.

Justice Hoeben rejected both arguments, stating that the ICAC Act provides no distinction in relation to personal or private conduct.

On 3 November, when speaking with Lawyers Weekly, the acting NSW legal services commissioner Jim Milne questioned whether a public inquiry was necessary to investigate Cunneen’s alleged actions.

Barrister and legal commentator Greg Barns, who is also a spokesperson for the Australian Lawyers Alliance, previously claimed on ABC radio that he did not believe it was within ICAC’s remit to conduct “what is essentially a criminal investigation”.

Lawyers Weekly contacted the Australian Lawyers Alliance requesting an interview with Barns, but did not receive a response prior to publication.

Win some, lose some

Cunneen and Moses may have lost their bid to stop the ICAC inquiry, but the silks were winners in a recent NSW Bar Council election ballot.

Cunneen and Moses each received more than 300 votes – placing them among the top five silks standing for election.

Voting closed at 1pm on Thursday 6 November, almost a week after ICAC announced it was seeking to commence its public inquiry into the allegations against Cunneen.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Cunneen loses bid to stop ICAC probe
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...