find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
SA auxiliary court appointments under fire

SA auxiliary court appointments under fire

Andrew Harris

Legal bodies have criticised the recent appointment of District Court judges to the South Australian Supreme Court on an auxiliary basis.

Last week the South Australian government named district court judges Barry Beazley, Wayne Chivell and Paul Slattery as Auxiliary Supreme Court justices for the next 15 months.

However, Judge Beazley refused the position, according to a report in the The Advertiser.

The temporary appointments were slammed by SA Bar Association president Andrew Harris, who warned the perceived independence of the judiciary was at stake.

While he acknowledged Auxiliary Justices could be useful to address specific cases where the existing justices of the Supreme Court were conflicted, he suggested such matters were rare and could be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

“My principal concern, however, is that the perception of the fair-minded bystander will be that the three Auxiliary Justices are on some form of probation or trial run to see whether or not they can secure a permanent appointment to the Supreme Court,” he said. 

“This is the antithesis of judicial independence where judges carry out their duties without fear or favour and without regard to how the government, which appointed them, will react to their decisions.”

While he suggested the justices would carry out their duties “fearlessly and independently”, the public may not have the same confidence.

“It is an issue of principle and not of personalities,” he said.

Justice Sulan of the Supreme Court is due to retire later on this month, and Mr Harris said he “sincerely hoped” the new auxiliary appointments were not a substitute for a full-time Supreme Court seat.

“I would have thought that the government would have done better by making three additional permanent appointments of Judges to the District Court in addition to a permanent appointment to the Supreme Court,” he said.

“The backlog of cases and listing problems in the District Court is unlikely to be improved by some of the judges of that court being absent from time to time on Auxiliary Supreme Court duties.”

SA Law Society president David Caruso also criticised the move, echoing Mr Harris’s call for permanent appointments to be made instead.

“When we try to have District Court judges also serving as Supreme Court judges we're effectively asking an already overloaded system to do more, or at least the same, with less,” he said.

He praised Judge Beazley for refusing the position “for all the right reasons, namely the need for our courts to be rejuvenated with respect to judicial succession”.

South Australian attorney-general John Rau told Lawyers Weekly the appointments were made at the request of the courts and were not selected by him or his department.

“The use of auxiliary judges is a matter for the courts,” he said.

“They are necessary from time to time to hear cases that may require specific legal expertise, or in cases where local judicial officers have a conflict of interest.”

Asked about plans for permanent seats on the court, he said appointments would be “made in due course as may be required”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

SA auxiliary court appointments under fire
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...