Goodbye job applications, hello dream career
Seize control of your career and design the future you deserve with LW career

‘Crushing workload’ for NSW District Court

New statistics have highlighted an urgent need to address the extreme criminal case delays occurring in the NSW District Court.

user iconEmma Musgrave 31 May 2017 The Bar
Now or later signage, delays, NSW District Court
expand image

The NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research has found that criminal case delays have worsened over the past 12 months, demonstrating a sufficient need for continued action to address the issue.

“This report demonstrates the fact that the District Court, while very productive, has a crushing workload,” said New South Wales Bar Association president Arthur Moses SC.

“The number of matters remitted for trial in the District Court has increased by over 35 per cent over the last four years. Although the number of matters finalised by trial in that period increased by almost 40 per cent, criminal trial delays have continued to increase despite the best efforts of the court.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The median time between arrest and trial finalisation is now 714 days (up from 512 days in 2012) and there are currently around 2,000 criminal trials awaiting hearing in the District Court.”

Mr Moses noted that such delays have an impact upon victims of crime and witnesses who must anxiously await hearings, as well as individuals who are in custody awaiting trial that may be ultimately acquitted.

“Delays in matters being heard may also result in evidence going stale, which may jeopardise prosecutions or result in unfair hearings,” Mr Moses added.

Mr Moses said the NSW Bar Association looks forward to continuing to provide its input on solutions to address these issues.

“The bar will work with the court and the Attorney-General to find effective and lasting means of addressing these delays,” he said.

“While the government has announced a scheme for early guilty pleas which the bar is still considering, the initiatives, however, must include the allocation of additional resources for legal aid to ensure the efficient preparation of matters and the appointment of additional judges to the court.”

The Law Society of New South Wales has also spoken out about the issue of court delays, saying that the backlogs are delaying access to justice.

The NSW Government’s recent $200 million investment into justice and $6 million for community legal centres will assist in plugging holes in an ailing system.

According to a statement from the legal body, funding for the trial courts, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) and Legal Aid NSW must be maintained to reduce the severe backlogs and delays that have built up over the past four years.

“Record numbers of people are clogging our jails because of an increase in accused persons refused bail and offenders handed prison sentences,” chief executive officer of the Law Society of NSW Michael Tidball said.

“Police are bringing more alleged offenders before the courts, but victims of crime and accused persons are waiting significantly longer for cases to be resolved because judicial officers and courts do not have sufficient means to manage backlogs.”

In addition, Mr Tidball noted that greater investment into early intervention, crime prevention and diversionary programs particularly in regional areas, where these options are often unavailable, could reduce recidivism and help ease the prison population.

The expansion of the NSW Drug Court must also be a government priority, he said.

“The NSW Drug Court has proven to be a more cost effective and successful solution to lowering recidivism rates for offenders than prison,” Mr Tidball said.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

Tags