find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Slaters throws the book at Watchstone

Slaters throws the book at Watchstone


Slater and Gordon has launched a lawsuit against Watchstone in a bold attempt to recover some of its losses.

The Australian law firm announced late last week that its UK subsidiary intended to file a claim against Watchstone Group, formerly known as Quindell, over the acquisition of its professional services division in 2015.

The $1.1 billion claim centres on the allegation of ‘fraudulent misrepresentation’, with Slater and Gordon arguing that it would not have made the acquisition had it known the true financial state that Quindell was in.

Louise Massey, who leads the Australian litigation and dispute resolution practice at Dentons, told Lawyers Weekly that Slater and Gordon will need to prove several facts for the claim to succeed.

“In order to be successful in the proceedings, Slater and Gordon must prove that Watchstone made a representation to it regarding Quindell, a representation that Watchstone knew was untrue, or that they had a reckless disregard to its truthfulness,” Ms Massey said.

“Slater and Gordon must have relied on the representation and been induced by the representation to enter into the contract, and suffered harm as a result of the representation.”

Ms Massey said such a substantial claim of misconduct could be difficult to prove, although one would expect that Slater and Gordon must have a reasonable basis for making it. She noted that a similar claim, relating to $88 million held in escrow by Watchstone following the acquisition, was dismissed as groundless late last year.

Associate Professor Michael Legg of UNSW, who specialises in litigation, class actions and corporate and securities law, told Lawyers Weekly that although little detail about the claim has been revealed, it may well have merit.

“I think from what’s been said in the media it would strike me as though it’s legitimate, because it definitely seems that Quindell’s valuations and how they were conducting themselves was not clear to Slater and Gordon when they acquired the business,” he said.

“Whose fault that is, though, is something that is a little hard to comment on, because arguably Slater and Gordon would have done due diligence and perhaps that should have picked things up. But it’s very hard with due diligence, particularly under time pressure, to unravel a fraudulent scheme.

“So I don’t think at this stage we can really comment on the merits, but there definitely seems to be something there.”

Ms Massey agreed that Watchstone may use Slater and Gordon’s responsibility to conduct due diligence as part of its defence.

“Watchstone may seek to challenge the causation requirement of ‘reasonable reliance’,” she said.

“Should Watchstone raise this defence, the court must determine whether the due diligence undertaken by Slater and Gordon was sufficient in relation to the transaction and whether it would have identified the misrepresentation.

“Ultimately one would expect that Watchstone will seek to defend the matter on the basis that they had reasonable grounds to believe the representation, if made, was true or no reason to believe that it was not true.”

If successful, the $1.1 billion claim could help Slater and Gordon to dig itself out of trouble in the class action brought by Maurice Blackburn on behalf of Slaters’ aggrieved shareholders.

Slater and Gordon announced yesterday that it had received a notice from the UK Serious Fraud Office requiring the production of documents relating to the acquisition, as part of the office’s investigation into Watchstone’s accounting practices.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Slaters throws the book at Watchstone
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice, ALA, right-to-die law
‘Right-to-die’ laws would be a relief for terminally ill: ALA
The passage of an assisted dying bill through the lower house of Victorian Parliament has been haile...
Diversity top of agenda for future WA Law Society president
The advancement of diversity in the Western Australian legal profession will be one of the key items...
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...