find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
The thorns in Slaters’ side

The thorns in Slaters’ side


Slater and Gordon announced its long-awaited recapitalisation plan last Thursday, but there are several sticking points for the struggling firm, according to one academic. 

The once-untouchable listed law firm announced last week that its lenders will control 95 to 96 per cent of its equity under the recapitalisation plan.

Group managing director Andrew Grech has stepped down, with the rest of the board to exit as replacements are found.

However, Slaters’ lenders, led by Anchorage, have agreed to the recapitalisation on several conditions. The main snag is the settlement of the outstanding $250 million shareholder class action brought against the firm by Maurice Blackburn.

UNSW associate professor of finance Mark Humphery-Jenner told Lawyers Weekly the class action is a significant hurdle for Slater and Gordon before the recapitalisation plan can be implemented.

“It is possible that [the $250 million class action] would put the recapitalisation in jeopardy if a) the settlement [was] that large and b) there [was] no other way of perhaps getting liability insurance to cover it, some form of indemnification.”

Mr Humphery-Jenner also noted the condition that the claim be settled by 10 July, only a week from today. He said that while this is unlikely, the lenders have given themselves the option to extend the deadline, as Slaters’ recovery is in their own best interests.

“They might come to some form of settlement [by 10 July], but if something doesn’t happen then potentially the lenders could decide to not go ahead with the recapitalisation,” he said.

“I imagine they’d probably try and extend the deadline if that were the case, though.  

“It gives them a free option. If they extend the deadline, they can always withdraw from the recapitalisation later on if the conditions aren’t met.

“So I guess they don’t lose anything by extending the deadline if they believe there’s still a possibility of the settlement being favourable.”

Slater and Gordon has also been served with class action claims from Babscay Pty Ltd and ACA Lawyers, alleging that its financial statements misled shareholders in the years leading up to the disastrous acquisition of Quindell.

It is unclear whether the lenders require these claims to be settled too, or whether they are required to be deemed of “little or no financial consequence”, in the words of Slaters’ recapitalisation announcement.

Mr Humphery-Jenner also raised that the plan does not consider any further class actions that may be launched against Slater and Gordon. When the firm announced on 19 June that several smaller firms it had acquired in Australia and the UK would be free to sell their equity from today (3 July), the UNSW academic said these firms may consider commencing proceedings of their own.

“The holders of the previously escrowed shares are now in a similar position to that of other shareholders,” he said.

“These shareholders would foreseeably consider their legal options if they feel they were misled regarding the true value of the shares they accepted as consideration.

“It’s not clear the extent to which, if at all, that would impact the recapitalisation. It doesn’t seem to be stated whether there’s any condition [in the recapitalisation announcement] in relation to that, but presumably that’s something the lenders would want to take into account.”

Slater and Gordon has its work cut out, not just fighting class actions but also renewing its board and reassuring clients and the market that it has a future.

“To give Andrew Grech full credit, clearly he had the motivation and the wherewithal to create what was effectively the first listed law firm on the market,” Mr Humphery-Jenner said.

“At this point in time though, Slater and Gordon needs board renewal … at least for two reasons: firstly, it appears that the board has made some decisions that are potentially questionable, particularly in relation to acquisitions.

“That’s leaving aside any of the allegations in relation to accounting. Just the value creation in the acquisitions has been potentially dubious, particularly the Quindell acquisition.

“The second reason is that regardless of the competence of the board, the market might need more confidence that the company will be under new management. Renewing the board will help to increase market confidence that the firm will take a different direction going forward, and might avoid repeating some of the mistakes it’s already made.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

The thorns in Slaters’ side
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...