find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1-3 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Join a dynamic Firm · Excellent career growth opportunity
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
Client’s legal privilege a linchpin for justice: LCA

Client’s legal privilege a linchpin for justice: LCA

AS THE Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) contemplates a review of client legal privilege (CLP), the nation’s chief representative body for the legal profession has warned against changing…

AS THE Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) contemplates a review of client legal privilege (CLP), the nation’s chief representative body for the legal profession has warned against changing what it says is a fundamental right of clients and a crucial tool of justice.

The Law Council of Australia (LCA) is against changes to the laws governing CLP, especially where it acts in the case of corporations, royal commissions or in any other investigatory or regulatory context.

While attending the most recent LAWASIA conference in Hong Kong last week, LCA president Tim Bugg told Lawyers Weekly that the systems that monitor the use of CLP are already working well, as the Federal Court’s handling of the issue in regard to the Cole Inquiry showed.

“Commissioner Cole expressed some frustration about the process and at that time was keen for the question of privilege in relation to documentation and communication to be determined by the royal commission itself,” Bugg said.

“However, it was dealt with by the Federal Court and we would say appropriately and in a timely way.”

As a right of clients, not lawyers, CLP is an essential component of our legal system, Bugg said.

“We live in a world of increasing legislation affecting people’s rights [and] obligations. The general public must be in a position to obtain advice in a frank, free-speaking environment with their legal advisers.”

And while the LCA position is that CLP should not be altered, Bugg said the process could nonetheless be sped up to improve efficiency.

However, tinkering with CLP to address Commissioner Cole and Federal Attorney-General Philip Ruddock’s concerns may in itself be the cause of further delays. For if clients withhold key information from their lawyers, this might result in the giving of incomplete advice, Bugg said.

According to Bugg, there is definite merit in ensuring lawyers are kept well-informed about CLP through ongoing education.

“[But] even if they have been educated to the appropriate level … from time to time their advice about a particularly CLP may not be right,” he said.

“That doesn’t mean they are doing anything wrong. The way in which a particular document or piece of communication is interpreted may vary from one lawyer to another. But that ultimately will be determined by the court, and that is the appropriate forum for the determination for claims of privilege.”

If the ALRC considers changes to CLP, then the LCA wants safeguards to be put in place to mitigate the damage caused to the administration of justice and the rights of individuals and entities. Yet Bugg acknowledged there have been exceptional circumstances in the past, such as the James Hardie asbestos case, in which a change to the way CLP operated was acceptable.

The public interest in ensuring that compensation went to asbestosis victims could have been said to override the public interest in having CLP as an ongoing principle, “but those exceptional circumstances, we say, will be very few and far between,” he said.

“And importantly, in the context of the royal commissions for example, no one involved is saying royal commissioners have not got to the proof of issues before them. Rather, it’s been more of a complaint perhaps of the process being slowed up.”

In order to address shortcomings in the exercise of CLP, the LCA is in favour of clarifying its application to all Commonwealth investigatory or regulatory agencies, and establishing processes and guidelines for government agencies. In its submission, the LCA acknowledged the very existence of CLP, and associated claims, “may be regarded as an inconvenient obstacle to the efficiency of the investigative process”.

“[But] that in itself is not a justification for the abrogation of CLP, but rather for the establishment of better procedures for recognising and determining CLP claims.”

If CLP were to be annulled or changed in any way, there would be harm done to the lawyer-client relationship, compliance with the law and the overall administration of justice, the LCA said.

The LCA submission was made in response to the Australian Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) Issues Paper No 33, Client Legal Privilege and Federal Investigatory Bodies (IP-33). Submissions will be ongoing until the ALRC reaches its verdict later in the year.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Client’s legal privilege a linchpin for justice: LCA
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...