find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
High fees and high stakes follow Lehman ruling

High fees and high stakes follow Lehman ruling

A Federal Court case that has seen more than $28 million in legal fees paid to some of Australia’s leading law firms could have set a precedent for a host of similar class actions against financial service providers.

Last week, Justice Steven Rares ruled against the now-defunct investment bank Lehman Brothers Australia in an action brought by three New South Wales councils on behalf of 72 Australian councils, charities and church groups.

Experts believe that the bank may be liable for as much as $200 million or more in damages.

The judgment could have ramifications for financial service providers in Australia and globally as it’s the first-of-its-kind court ruling on misleading and deceptive conduct by an investment bank.

"I understand that a number of Australian banks were involved in the sale of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) to councils as well,” said Amanda Banton (pictured), a partner at Piper Alderman who acted as solicitor for the councils alongside Noel Huntley SC and Anthony John Meagher SC, with barristers David Sulan and Lachlan Armstrong.

“If there was any inadequate disclosure on their part, or inadequate consideration of the clients’ risk profile, they will be open to action based on the findings of this judgement,” added Banton.

The Federal Court found that Lehman Brothers Australia, represented by Ashurst alongside John Sheahan SC and barristers Scott Nixon, James Hutton and Simon Fitzpatrick, had breached its fiduciary duties to councils, charities and churches by selling them synthetic CDOs.

CDOs are highly risky, complex financial derivatives that went sour during the global financial crisis.

Justice Rares said Lehmans had engaged in misleading conduct, had breached fiduciary duties, had breached their contract and were negligent.

Piper Alderman and litigation funder IMF (Australia) have welcomed the Court’s decision.

According to a report to creditors released earlier this month, the liquidation of Lehman Brothers Australia has cost more than $28 million in legal costs since September 2008. Since May last year, $9.7 million has been splashed out on legal fees. 

Under the original Lehmans liquidation scheme clients were looking at receiving between two and 16 cents in the dollar. Following the judgement, they are looking at receiving more than 33 cents in the dollar from the estate of Lehmans.

The judgment is significant as it may lead to many other similar actions relating to CDOs by councils and not-for-profits in Australia and across the world.

Baton believes the laws need to protect investors who lack assessment capabilities when it comes to complex financial instruments.

“Our clients would not have purchased these investments had they been aware of the substantial risks of the products, including the exposure to a complete loss of capital.  They were conservative investors and the products which were sold to them by Lehman were simply not suitable,” she said.  

IMF (Australia) executive director John Walker said the judgement “will be carefully examined by investors and regulatory authorities around the world”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

High fees and high stakes follow Lehman ruling
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Dec 15 2017
Timing ‘critical’ in unusual contempt of court ruling
A recent case could have interesting implications for contempt of court rulings, according to a Ferr...
Dec 14 2017
International arbitration and business culture
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the impact of international arbitration on t...
Papua New Guinea flag
Dec 14 2017
World-first mining case launched in PNG
Citizens of Papua New Guinea have launched landmark legal proceedings against the country’s govern...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...