find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Lawyers don’t have it too bad

Lawyers don’t have it too bad

A leading insurance lawyer has told a conference that financial advisors are more vulnerable to civil liability claims than lawyers.

Cain Jackson (pictured), a partner at Wotton + Kearney, gave a keynote address at a thought leadership breakfast on consumer regulation in Sydney last month.

Jackson said that financial advisors are the most vulnerable of all professions by a considerable margin when it comes to civil liability claims.

“It has become patently clear to professional indemnity insurers as, a result of their claims’ experience since 2008, that financial advisors are, without doubt, the most vulnerable of the professions to civil liability claims,” said Jackson. “By comparison to engineers, lawyers, accountants, architects, doctors, valuers, real estate agents and the litany of other professions insured by the professional indemnity (PI) market.

“Financial advisors are by far and away the most heavily regulated and exposed.”

Jackson said the vulnerability of financial advisors was compounded by the “knock-on effect of tort reform” and law firms that have traditionally practised in the personal injuries arena targeting financial advisors as “the new growth area for their businesses”.

“Professional indemnity insurers have observed the “usual suspects” in the personal injury space rapidly expand their activities in financial services litigation,” he said.

In particular, Jackson highlighted Maurice Blackburn and Slater & Gordon as becoming more visible in the financial services sector by virtue of their submissions as part of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) consultation process.

“In essence, from an insurers perspective, the FOFA reforms represent yet another layer of regulation with increased risk attached.”

Who's watching the watchers?
In his address, Jackson took aim at ASIC and the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), expanding on criticisms he has previously made about FOS in Lawyers Weekly.

{^widget|(name)RBI.Video.BOTR_1|(PlayerCode)kmIxPosR|(VideoCode)6Ve19mRO|(image_guid)1e4bcf3f-ea05-437e-b48e-49d4192753c8|(widget_displayname)Bits+on+the+Run+Player^}

He criticised ASIC’s expectations regarding adequate compensation arrangements and said FOS lacks a “predictable process” in the management of a dispute and that its “rudimentary and loose set of rules should be confined to small claims”.

FOS’ maximum award amounts are $150,000 for general insurance-broking disputes and $280,000 for investment disputes and all other disputes under its terms of reference.

“There is no doubt that FOS represents compromised justice for members,” said Jackson. “That compromise is entirely acceptable and appropriate, but only to a point. Insurers and some members are rapidly reaching the view that this point has been not only reached but exceeded.”

The gloves come off
Not surprisingly, Jackson’s views struck a chord with the audience, which mainly consisted of lawyers, financial advisors, fund managers and underwriters.

“I have heard many planners say the reason they don’t like going to FOS is they say it is a bit of a lay-down misere, you go to FOS, you are going to lose,” said Money Management editor Mike Taylor when asking a question to Nic Crowhurst, the company secretary at FOS.

“How much of this room would like me to say yes,” replied Crowhurst, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, before going on to say: “Obviously we don’t agree with that.

“Since 2010 we have done 569 determinations in favour of the applicant, 300 of those have been under $50,000, two have been in excess of $500,000 and there have been none in excess of $700,000.”

Crowhurst had previously told Lawyers Weekly he was looking forward to the panel discussion to "clarify misconceptions" about the organisation.

Christina Kalantzsis from Alexis Compliance and Risk said that she often advises her clients to settle because “they have no confidence that if it goes to a determination what the actual amount will be”.

Taylor facilitated a panel discussion following Jackson’s keynote address that featured Jackson, Crowhurst, Kalantzsis and ASIC senior executive team leader Louise Macaulay, who also gave a keynote address.

{^widget|(name)RBI.Video.BOTR_1|(PlayerCode)kmIxPosR|(VideoCode)wcricYXD|(image_guid)1e4bcf3f-ea05-437e-b48e-49d4192753c8|(widget_displayname)Bits+on+the+Run+Player^}

The other panel members were Michael Herron from Catlin Australia and Premium Wealth Management CEO Paul Harding-Davis.

Herron made the point that insurers “embrace” the prospect of a fast, low-cost resolution of a dispute that FOS can provide. However, he added there is a feeling plaintiffs get a “dry run” in FOS “before they play their “real game”.

Macaulay said she was not surprised to hear such views aired at the table, but made the point that there would always be a role for an ASIC-approved external dispute resolution scheme (EDR) such as FOS.

“It is really poor service that is the biggest driver to a client getting angry enough to take it to a claim,” said Harding-Davis in reply to Macaulay.

“An EDR system makes perfect sense. We are all concerned about the mechanism at how well it is working at the moment.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyers don’t have it too bad
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...