find the latest legal job
Inhouse Legal Counsel -18 months-4 PAE - Real Estate Investment Company
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· In brand new prestigious CBD offices
View details
Senior Associate - Competition, Policy & Regulatory
Category: Other | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Work with a well regarded Partner · Sydney CBD
View details
Commercial Litigation Senior Associate
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Lawyers Weekly Australia Partner of the Year 2016, Insolvency
View details
MULTIPLEX Regional Legal Counsel (Vic) | 7 to 10 years + PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Career defining in-house role · Tier One international contractor
View details
Junior Lawyer - Personal Injury Law
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Parramatta & Western Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Highly specialized practice · Challenging role with great opportunities
View details
ALA ‘extremely disappointed’ by child abuse compo rejection

ALA ‘extremely disappointed’ by child abuse compo rejection

Andrew MORRISON

The federal government is failing victims of institutional child abuse by saying ‘no’ to a national compensation scheme, says the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

Dr Andrew Morrison SC (pictured), spokesperson for the ALA, said the government’s apparent abdication of responsibility was “very troubling”.

“The federal government took the responsibility for setting up a Royal Commission to investigate this issue of institutional child sexual abuse, yet it won’t support the provisional recommendations of its own inquiry,” Dr Morrison said.

The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse released a paper in January recommending a $4.37 billion scheme over 10 years, with the government covering about $2 billion.

Out of this contribution, $582 million would be used to cover compensation that institutions could not afford. Private institutions would be required to contribute $2.4 billion.

The scheme assumed victims would receive on average $65,000 each, although this has been viewed as an underestimate of costs by some advocate groups.

In its blunt, two-page submission, prepared by the Australian Government Solicitor, the government claimed the scheme was too expensive and difficult to implement.

The submission argues that “the institutions in which child sexual abuse occurred should bear responsibility for providing redress”, rather than the government.

It suggested that the time a national scheme would take to negotiate would frustrate abuse victims and rejected the idea that the federal government should be a "funder of last resort".

Chief royal commissioner Justice Peter McClellan said the commissioners were disappointed that a structural approach, which would “ensure a just, fair and consistent outcome for all victims”, was not favoured by the government.

The commission also received submissions from state governments, with the South Australian and Tasmanian governments siding with the federal government in opposition and the NSW and Victorian governments offering support.

The ALA has criticised the federal government’s submission for not addressing the issue of limitation periods.

“One step that the Commonwealth could take is in negotiating a harmonisation of retrospective abolition of limitation periods for survivors of abuse across the country,” Dr Morrison said.

“This would be an important first step in securing justice for victims, enabling access to sue at common law.”

The Victorian Government recently moved to abolish time limits on child abuse cases, making it easier for victims to seek legal redress.

 

 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

ALA ‘extremely disappointed’ by child abuse compo rejection
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Animal law moots, advocacy, Melbourne University, Australia and New Zealand Intervarsity Moot on Animal Law
Sep 25 2017
Moot unleashes animal advocacy
Melbourne has played host to one of the largest animal law moots, with student participants put th...
Scales
Sep 25 2017
Transgender teens should not need legal approval for hormone treatment, court hears
A transgender 17-year-old known as Kelvin has appealed in the Family Court against the requirement o...
Appointed, Victorian Legal Services Commissioner
Sep 25 2017
NFP CEO appointed Victorian Legal Services Commissioner
The CEO of a Victorian not-for profit pro bono legal services provider has been named as the state...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...