find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
VLA spending questioned following legal aid investigation

VLA spending questioned following legal aid investigation

A new report has highlighted the funding strain on the Victoria Legal Aid system but also prompted calls to examine its governing body.

The report, commissioned by the Law Institute of Victoria (LIV) and carried out by PricewaterhouseCoopers, found that over the last five years grants of legal aid had been cut by 24 per cent for private practitioners and 27 per cent for in-house VLA lawyers.

Speaking at the report’s launch, LIV president Katie Miller warned the system was under a “clear strain” despite lowered fees for private lawyers and restricted access.

“Some time ago, we passed the limits at which lowering fees and restricting eligibility criteria would assist in doing more with less,” she said, adding that the system could become “unviable” for private practitioners.

In the report, PwC found that key data around the legal aid system was unavailable from Victoria Legal Aid, particularly around the costs of using in-house lawyers and private practitioners.

Ms Miller urged the VLA to disclose these figures and give “consideration to adopting consultative arrangements that ensure stronger representation of the LIV and the Victorian Bar, as well as other justice system representatives”.

However, the Victorian Bar Association took a less conciliatory stance, with president James WS Peters QC questioning how efficiently the VLA delivered its services.

“The Victorian Bar remains concerned about how VLA spends its increasingly limited funds,” Mr Peters said.

“VLA’s in-house model is of particular concern. Greater transparency is required.”

The Criminal and Family Law Private Practitioner Service Delivery Model report created a cost estimate, based on public data rather than VLA figures, showing in-house services cost 2.5 times more for criminal cases and four times more for family law cases than services from private barristers.

"PwC recommends that further work is undertaken to determine the relative cost-efficiency of services, across different jurisdictions and matter types, and that the results of this work be made publicly available and be used to inform VLA’s future service mix," the report urged.

On calculations by the Victorian Bar, Mr Peters believes the VLA could engage a private barrister for 20 trials and 20 pleas for the cost of one in-house lawyer each year.

Mr Peters also raised concerns about VLA’s board, particularly the lack of members with criminal trial and appellate court experience.

“Increased consultation with the Bar, as recommended by PwC, would be welcomed," he said. "However, further review of the VLA’s governance model is required."

Ms Miller suggested the key lesson from the report was that more information was needed to ensure decisions around funding could be made based on evidence and consultation.

She expressed a hope the report may prompt "improved allocation of legal aid funds in the future and a greater involvement from private lawyers in funding decisions, given that they provide approximately 70 per cent of legal aid services".

Like this story? Subscribe to our free newsletter and receive Lawyers Weekly every day straight to your inbox. 

 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

VLA spending questioned following legal aid investigation
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Jackie Rhodes
06:04
Report sheds light on LGBTQI inclusion in law firms
A recent report has revealed the varying perceptions on LGBTQI diversity and inclusion in the Austra...
Women in business
06:00
Annabel Crabb headlines Women in Business Forum
Political journalist Annabel Crabb has appeared at the Coleman Greig Lawyers Women in Business Forum...
Dec 11 2017
Warm welcome for new district court judges
Three practitioners who were appointed as district court judges in WA have been congratulated by ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...