find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Single revenue pool better for clients: Jones Day

Single revenue pool better for clients: Jones Day

Mark Crean

Pooling profits across countries is rather unusual, particularly for a firm as large as Jones Day, but it provides an incentive to share work internationally – to the clients’ benefit, says new Jones Day partner Mark Crean. 

“Having one profit pool removes what might otherwise encourage behaviours that would not end up with the work being done by the best person in the best place, wherever that may be,” said Mr Crean (pictured), a former Herbert Smith Freehills deputy senior partner who joined Jones Day this week.

Mr Crean’s view is shared by Jones Day’s partner-in-charge in Sydney, Tim L’Estrange. He believes that sharing revenue globally means that lawyers tend to remain neutral about whether a client is serviced within their office or at a Jones Day office on the other side of the world.

”Neutrality is really important because you don't want to have people in, say, Australia hanging on and trying to do what should properly be being done in, say, Japan or North America because they want the revenue to flow to this country,” he said.

“It is important to align the structure of the firm with the delivery of its services,” he added.

Jones Day is one of the largest US law firms, with 2,400 lawyers across 42 countries. It launched in Australia in 1998 and now has offices in Sydney and Perth.

It is a law firm in the traditional sense, with every partner worldwide contributing to a single profit pool.

“We do not structure ourselves along different geographies, different regions, different countries – there is just one pool of revenue,” said Mr L’Estrange.

Other global firms, such as Norton Rose Fulbright, King & Wood Mallesons, DLA Piper, Dentons and Baker & McKenzie, operate as a single brand but are actually swiss vereins, with each entity within the firm having a separate revenue pool.* 

Capitalising on globalisation

Mr Crean, who was previously the chairman of Freehills, oversaw the initial phase of the firm’s global merger with Herbert Smith – but also saw a rapid transformation across the Australian legal market.

Several domestic firms underwent international mergers, becoming what we know them as today: King & Wood Mallesons, Allens, Norton Rose Fulbright and Ashurst.

“There is no doubt that the industry has changed,” Mr Crean said. “Internationalisation has caused turbulence. I think it is too early to tell who the real winners and losers will be.”

He said mergers involved some level of risk and needed careful management.

“Will we see more mergers?” he asked. “I think you look at what's happening with Slater and Gordon at the moment, you can see the downsides of mergers if you take on too many things or get distracted.”

Mr L’Estrange said it should come as no “great shock” to lawyers that international corporations are seeking as much alignment as possible from service providers.

“So if you are sitting in Palo Alto in California or in Frankfurt there is increasingly a desire to try to use [the same] firm,” he said.

“That means, however, that well-disciplined, well-respected firms operating in multiple jurisdictions will probably continue to pick up cross-border work.

“True, there will always be work in a domestic market for domestic players. But there are significant benefits ‎to global alignments,” he said.

*Hogan Lovells has a single profit pool worldwide but was previously incorrectly listed as a swiss verein in this story.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Single revenue pool better for clients: Jones Day
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...