find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Peak bodies sound alarm on Malaysian Bar 'threat'

Peak bodies sound alarm on Malaysian Bar 'threat'


The Law Council of Australia and Australian Bar Association have issued warnings to the Malaysian government, following proposed amendments that “threaten” the independence of the country’s legal practices.

The Malaysian government has proposed a number of changes to the country’s Legal Profession Act 1976 (LPA), including a provision to grant the minister in charge of legal affairs the power to appoint two members of government to sit on the Bar Council.

Other amendments proposed include a significant increase in the quorum requirement, the prevention of postal votes, and a requirement of 10 or more years’ experience as an advocate and solicitor, restricting the ability of many state Bar members to run for Council.

In an open letter to the Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, Law Council of Australia president Stuart Clark AM said he is deeply concerned about how these proposed changes would impact Malaysian lawyers and Malaysian democracy more broadly.

“The Law Council believes an independent Bar Association is an essential requirement for the protection of citizens’ rights in a democratic society,” said Mr Clark.

“The amendments proposed by the Malaysian government significantly restrict the powers of the Malaysian Bar Council to conduct itself in an impartial and independent manner.”

In the open letter, Mr Clark also noted that the proposed amendments appear to contravene both the UN’s Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, and the International Bar Association’s International Principles on Conduct for the Legal Profession – both of which aim to protect the independence of bar associations.

“The Law Council is aware of the proud and respected global standing of the Malaysian Bar Council and fear the Malaysian government’s proposed amendments will threaten that position,” he said.

“True independence strengthens the effective administration of justice as well as increasing the integrity of the legal and political systems.

“Malaysia, as a country which represents the Rule of Law, should desist from any action which could stifle the independence of the Malaysian Bar Council.”

Australian Bar Association president Patrick O’Sullivan QC echoed this sentiment and also issued an open letter to Mr Razak, urging his government to reconsider its proposed changes to the country’s LPA.

“Australia and Malaysia enjoy good relations, a strong friendship and shared values,” he said.

“Among those shared values is the acknowledgement that an independent legal profession is one of the essential prerequisites for the protection of human rights, the Rule of Law, good governance and democracy.

“The Association supports the ongoing independence of Malaysia’s legal profession and respectfully requests the government to reconsider the proposed amendments which threaten the independence of the Malaysian Bar.”

Mr O’Sullivan said that if the proposed changes are approved, Malaysian residents will feel negative flow-on effects.

“The Malaysian Bar has long been a defender of human rights and the Rule of Law,” he said.

“It is that very independence which has benefited the people of Malaysia for many years, however under such an arrangement, the Malaysian Bar’s ability to address on controversial issues that are at odds with the government will be compromised.

“As a consequence, the interests of the people of Malaysia would be adversely affected.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Peak bodies sound alarm on Malaysian Bar 'threat'
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...