find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
$20K ticket out of ‘no-man’s land’ cancelled for new grads

$20K ticket out of ‘no-man’s land’ cancelled for new grads

While the controversial proposal to offer new lawyers two years’ formal training in exchange for upwards of $20,000 has been canned, the underlying problem of graduate oversupply remains, the consultant to WBH Legal has said.

The cost of a law degree is significant, so it comes as no surprise that the question of how much more young graduates have to invest to get their foot in the door hits a nerve.

Those concerns were sharply reflected in the reaction to WBH Legal's 2015 proposal that graduates pay $22,000 for a job. In return, the firm offered participants in its two-year program the supervision and training needed to obtain an unrestricted practising certificate.

At the time the program was criticised for exploiting new, often desperate entrants to the job market, moving the Law Society of South Australia’s Ethics and Practice Committee to scrutinse the unorthodox business model.  

The firm recently announced its decision to walk away from the program, acknowledging that it provided an inequitable solution to the “problem” of too many graduates and too few opportunities in law.  

“While there were a sufficient number of applicants willing to pay the participation fee, the partners recognise that this carried the unpalatable consequence of creating an elitist solution to the fundamental problem,” WBH said.

“WBH Legal has decided not to proceed with the Adlawgroup project and the new firm will not be established. A number of options have been explored. However, the concept is not economically viable without asking the participating new lawyers to invest in their own futures.”

WBH Legal had proposed to operate the program through a new firm named Adlawgroup, which would be an offshoot of the WBH community group.

Speaking to Lawyers Weekly about the firm’s decision to cut the project, Tina Hailstone, group project manager and consultant, indicated that WBH was receptive to discussing other solutions.

There remains a large group of newly admitted lawyers who simply cannot break into the job market and are lingering in a “no-man’s land”, she said. Indeed, the high volume of queries that the firm was receiving from new lawyers was what prompted WBH’s principals to think about how to help at least some of that cohort in the first place.

“It wasn’t a question of trying to exploit the vulnerable – it was a question of trying to provide an opportunity where none otherwise existed,” Ms Hailstone said.

“It was just a way of saying ‘Well look, these newly admitted lawyers, they can’t go and set up on their own, they’re in a bit of a no-man’s land until they’ve had two years of experience. Is there a way in which we can at least provide them with that experience?’; in addition to other training like how to run a practice, business skills, marketing skills and all of those other things,” she said.

Public outcry followed the online listing inviting expressions of interest for the program last year, with a number of “vitriolic” emails sent to the forwarding address, Ms Hailstone said.

“It was starting to detract away from the day-to-day operations of the firm, so we said ‘Let’s pull the plug on this and see if others want to come together in think tanks and think about it’.

“But the fundamental problem hasn’t gone away: too many graduates, too few opportunities.

“And if the Law Society [of SA] wanted to form some sort of sub-committee to discuss the problem, that’s where WBH would be delighted to be part of that conversation,” Ms Hailstone said.

In its latest media statement, the firm noted that more than a year has passed since its proposed business operational model was put to the Law Society without a response.

According to Ms Hailstone, the Law Society’s silence was not the sole factor in WBH’s decision not to proceed with Adlawgroup.

“It is part of a wider decision, albeit that the partners looked at a way of trying to provide similar opportunities perhaps on a smaller scale, but there wasn’t really a way to do that without having some sort of participation fee,” she said.

While the firm has recognised its proposal is no longer viable, Ms Hailstone said it is time for an industry-wide review of the underlying problem facing the profession. Finding other ways to give an otherwise wasted talent pool of qualified lawyers a chance, in addition to meeting the legal needs of those who do not have adequate access to legal services, must be addressed, she said.

“If we could collaborate as an industry and talk about ways that these [issues] could be addressed, then we’re open-minded to that.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

$20K ticket out of ‘no-man’s land’ cancelled for new grads
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...