find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
VLA decries ‘irresponsible’ Centrelink data-matching

VLA decries ‘irresponsible’ Centrelink data-matching


Victoria Legal Aid has given evidence to the Senate inquiry into Centrelink’s use of an automated data-matching system for debt recovery, criticising the “robo-debt” initiative.

VLA managing director Bevan Warner and executive director legal practice Katie Miller appeared before the Senate committee on Tuesday.

The organisation is among many vocal opponents of the data-matching initiative (“the initiative”), and called on the government to suspend it in January. VLA has also made online resources available for people facing Centrelink debt repayments under the initiative.

“In our view, the initiative is a disquieting and ill-advised legal and policy development,” VLA said in its submission to the inquiry.

It added that while it supports the use of technology to improve government efficiency, including in the management of funds, in this case the initiative undermines key tenets of proper and lawful government action.

“Critically, in its design and operation, the initiative has effectively shifted the burden of responsible administration of government funds from the Commonwealth to individuals,” VLA said.

“At the same time, in practice, key elements of the design and application of the initiative fundamentally impede Centrelink customers’ abilities to understand, question or challenge an automated debt.

“The cumulative impact will damage the overall integrity of the Centrelink system.”

VLA voiced its concern with the opacity of the data-matching process, as well as the lack of justification for many of the debts.

“Further, we consider that the disclosure by the department of otherwise protected social security information in response to public criticism is jarring and concerning, both in terms of its lawfulness and its purported justification,” VLA said.

The organisation made an extensive list of recommendations to the inquiry. The first was that the initiative be suspended.

VLA also recommended that the relevant legislation be amended to “expressly preclude debt recovery systems akin to the initiative”, and that there be an element of human oversight in any future debt recovery initiatives to mitigate the risk of inaccurate data-matching.

The submission expressed strong doubts about the lawfulness of the initiative.

“The initiative raises serious questions about how a debt raised on the basis of the current data-matching exercise alone (referred to within this submission as a ‘robo-debt’) can be responsibly and lawfully treated as ‘a debt to the Commonwealth’ under the Social Security Act 1991,” VLA said.

“VLA has significant concerns that where a ‘robo-debt’ has been raised, it may not be sufficiently certain or accurate to satisfy the requirements for raising a debt under the Social Security Act.

“This is because under the relevant provisions of the Social Security Act, a debt is only recoverable by Centrelink or the department if, among other things, it is ‘owed to the Commonwealth’ and ‘a person who obtains the benefit of the payment was not entitled for a reason to obtain that benefit’.”

VLA said the initiative is irresponsible and carries a high risk that many individuals will have to pay erroneous debts. It argued that the government has, without consultation or warning, shifted the responsibility for an essential function to vulnerable people and the courts and tribunals.

“Even if the initiative is lawful, in our view, it should not be,” VLA said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

VLA decries ‘irresponsible’ Centrelink data-matching
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...