find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
In-House Legal Counsel (Mid to Senior)| Regulated Markets (Energy and Gas)
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Full PD on Request · Exciting High Impact Role
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Infrastructure Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Perth WA
· We'd be particularly interested to hear from you if you were a lawyer who knows your way around the infrastructure and energy sectors.
View details
No winners in high-tech litigation game, says judge

No winners in high-tech litigation game, says judge

JUSTICE KENNETH Hayne wants to know where all the civil trials have gone. A decline in the number of civil cases reaching trial over the past decade has prompted the High Court judge to question…

JUSTICE KENNETH Hayne wants to know where all the civil trials have gone. A decline in the number of civil cases reaching trial over the past decade has prompted the High Court judge to question the state of case management in Australia.

“We must dig deeper in order to understand better why fewer civil disputes are being determined by the application of judicial power,” Justice Hayne said in his speech to the Supreme and Federal Court Judges Conference on 23 January.

Justice Hayne did offer some clues as to the missing trials’ whereabouts. His speech discussed the shortcomings of modern litigation, including the sheer volume of information submitted for judicial consideration in the digital age.

According to Justice Hayne, statutory reform of tort law and an increase in alternative dispute resolution is an unsatisfactory explanation for the phenomenon of what he called “the vanishing trial”. Instead, he blamed the common law doctrine of contentious procedure for turning “litigation into a game”.

“If cases are settling because one party is able to so prolong and complicate the litigation as to outlast a financially weaker party, the system fails. Settlement in those circumstances is a mark of failure not success,” he said.

In a pragmatic assessment of the divergent interests of litigants, lawyers and justice, Justice Hayne said that it was not unusual for parties to “obfuscate and delay” proceedings. He also acknowledged the problem is often compounded by lawyers with an interest in delaying proceedings and lack of case management by judges.

“Not all lawyers will find it expedient to reduce the number of directions hearings that are held,” he said. “They are not unhappy if the case is over-managed. Each hearing will be a source of costs taken to account when budgeted costs to be charged are compared with bills actually rendered.”

The question “why?” was the focus of Justice Hayne’s speech. The role of a judge, according to Hayne, is to ask “why” repeatedly if necessary in order to compel wayward parties to be more direct.

“The judge can always ask ‘Why?’. And even when the parties are well represented by experienced lawyers, and the parties are in heated agreement about what is to happen, there will often be advantage in asking ‘Why?’,” he said.

“If the judge does not ask that question, there is a very real risk that the case will be under-managed.”

Justice Hayne advised that lawyers leave their memory sticks loaded with discovery documents at home, saying that there must be “good reason” to undertake the expensive exercise of providing access to every document discovered in a case available as an image file to “everyone in the courtroom”.

“The reason must be found in why doing this will help to decide the real issues in the case and decide those issues efficiently.”

The pursuit of modern methods is not an end in itself, Justice Hayne said. “It is not enough to say that we can do it. And it is certainly not enough to say that doing it will show how modern the particular court or judge is. The only modernity it will show is conformity to the modern trend of prolonging the trial of litigation,” he said.

“Prolonging the trial of litigation is a modern phenomenon, but it is not one of which any court could be proud.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

No winners in high-tech litigation game, says judge
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Law Council of Australia
Nov 21 2017
LCA calls for urgent adoption of ‘game-changing’ recommendation
The Law Council of Australia has urged for the immediate adoption of a key recommendation put forwar...
Sally Wheeler
Nov 20 2017
ANU College of Law appoints new dean
A distinguished legal academic and the former head of law of a higher education institution in Irela...
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...