find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Lawyers, raise your voice

Lawyers, raise your voice

Penny Wright

Greens Senator Penny Wright kicks off Law Week by urging lawyers to champion the administration of justice.

From the coalface to the floors of Parliament – all lawyers have a duty to the administration of justice and to the maintenance of the rule of law.

As a lawyer myself, I find Law Week a good time to consider what it means to be part of the legal profession in Australia and what we lawyers have in common: from those at the coalface in community legal centres to parliamentarians like me, who have trained or practised as lawyers along their path to public life.

Although our roles may be various, the defining features of the law, as a profession, are the duties and values we have in common.

I believe one of the most important duties is to the administration of justice.

I’ve been reflecting on the many lawyers who fulfil this duty, with honour and courage. Some take on unpopular cases, such as South Australian lawyer Stephen Kenny, who has steadfastly represented David Hicks for many long years.

Others staff community legal centres, and family violence prevention legal centres. I well know from my time in legal practice and as a Tribunal member, how life-changing good quality, legal advice can be. These lawyers render assistance practical ways, helping their clients secure housing after living rough or supporting them to stand up to an abusive partner in court. Their sense of duty to the administration of justice prevails in the face of chronic underfunding and funding uncertainty.

I take my hat off to them.

Some of my parliamentary colleagues are lawyers, too, of course, and it is interesting to observe the occasions when a commitment to the administration of justice prevails over populism and politics – and when it doesn’t. I sometimes find myself thinking, “They ought to know better.”

Such was the case with the recent treatment of Human Rights Commission President Professor Gillian Triggs, when she appeared before the Senate’s Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee in an Estimates hearing. The lawyer-parliamentarian Chair had apparently abandoned any duty to treat her courteously or, more alarmingly, to acknowledge the role Professor Triggs is required to fulfil, without fear or favour, by legislation.

As a member of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights I have had the privilege of working with Senators and Members of all political persuasions to consider the compatibility of proposed laws with Australia’s human rights obligations. This is critical work – particularly in the absence of a Human Rights Act. Not all members of that committee are lawyers, of course, but we also have an independent legal adviser who analyses the legislation from the rights-based perspective we are mandated to apply.

Until recently the committee has fulfilled its role by applying the consistent, principled analysis that has been missing from many other parliamentary and public debates. Regrettably, it is now showing signs of descending into the type of partisan culture that dominates other parliamentary committees. I am concerned the committee’s emerging culture risks undermining hard-won values the Australian legal profession holds dear, and may jeopardise one of the few mechanisms we have to make sure new laws are consistent with internationally recognised human rights.

Overall, my time in parliament has heightened my gratitude and pride in our profession. There has been much significant legislation to consider over the last four years, including national security, migration and privacy. Many lawyers generously contribute to parliamentary committees by making public submissions and attending to give evidence. I know that work is often unpaid and completed at night after a long day of paid work, or on weekends.

Lawyers bring great value to public debates and parliamentary inquiries because of a practical understanding of how laws operate, and a disinterested appreciation of hard-won legal rights and what is at stake if we lose them.

I am proud to belong to a profession that stands up for the rights of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged, and one that sounds the alarm when lawmakers overstep the line. And I’m proud to represent a party that believes in access to justice, and the promotion of human rights, even for the disadvantaged or unpopular.

This Law Week, I encourage all lawyers to keep raising their voices. I know it can take courage and sacrifice to speak out, but lawyers should never forget they are uniquely placed to support and champion the administration of justice. This work is valued.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyers, raise your voice
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...