find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Bar Association crunches numbers to fill legal aid funding hole

Bar Association crunches numbers to fill legal aid funding hole

The alcohol and gambling industries are being eyed by the Australian Bar Association, which has proposed special businesses levies as alternative revenue sources for the nation's chronically underfunded legal aid services.

The Australian Bar Association (ABA) has offered its own alternative legal aid funding models to keep up with the nationwide demand for services.

Following a roundtable discussion in Brisbane this month, the group has touted money from the gambling and alcohol industries as a viable income stream to ensure legal aid services continue to meet demand.

ABA president Patrick O’Sullivan QC said the roundtable focused on the “precursors” to being caught up in the justice system.

“As part of the discussion, we looked at the precursors that lead people to come into contact with the justice system, such as alcohol and gambling.

“We need to have a good look at these issues and consider revenue-raising options from the alcohol and gambling industries to directly support legal assistance,” Mr O’Sullivan said.

In response to unsatisfactory funding commitments from governments in both federal and state quarters, Mr O’Sullivan said it had become imperative for the ABA to consider a different way of doing things.

“We know Australia’s legal assistance services, such as legal aid and community legal centres throughout the country, are in crisis and everyday Australians are being denied access to justice as a result.

“We also know governments are working with increasingly strained resources and are unlikely to be able to deliver the financial panacea to resolve the situation,” Mr O’Sullivan said.

In May the federal government released its official response to a landmark Productivity Commission Access to Justice Arrangements report. In response to 16 of the report’s 83 recommendations, the Commonwealth made a number of funding commitments, including $1.6 billion for legal aid commissions and community legal centres through the National Partnership Agreement.

A number of legal bodies, including the Law Council of Australia, National Legal Aid and the Law Society of Tasmania, said the committed funds fell nowhere near the $200 million injection that the Productivity Commission had flagged as immediately essential.

Among the solutions the ABA put forward are a series of proposals to raise revenue and initiatives to resolve more disputes out of court. It suggested establishing a legal assistance fund that would derive income from levies on the gambling and alcohol industries, speeding fines and high-income corporations.

Mr O’Sullivan said that if these innovative options were taken up, together with funding commitments from the federal and state governments, legal aid services need not flounder.

“It is critical that we have the governments’ continued commitment to legal assistance so that these options are not seen as a way to reduce current or future government funding.

“However, we also believe it is time to consider alternatives available to assist and support current funding sources,” he said.

The group is preparing a detailed discussion paper, to be presented to the federal government later this year.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Bar Association crunches numbers to fill legal aid funding hole
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
07:05
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
07:00
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
07:00
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...