find the latest legal job
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Great Career Opportunity ·
View details
Insurance and Health Lawyer (1-4 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· New position to support Growth ·
View details
Ministers court controversy over terrorism sentencing

Ministers court controversy over terrorism sentencing

Fence

Three Liberal ministers have dodged contempt of court charges by apologising for their recent attack on the integrity of the Victorian judiciary, albeit reluctantly.

Health Minister Greg Hunt, Human Services Minister Alan Tudge and Assistant Minister to Treasurer Michael Sukkar apologised to the Victorian Court of Appeal last week for their comments on the state’s judiciary.

The comments were prompted by the sentencing of Sevdet Ramadan Besim, who planned a terrorist attack in 2015, and included claims that the courts were full of “hard-left activist judges” who were conducting “ideological experiments” by delivering terrorism sentences the ministers felt were too light.

Mr Besim was originally sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment, with a non-parole period of seven-and-a-half years. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) appealed the decision on the grounds that it was inadequate.

The ministers criticised comments made by Supreme Court Chief Justice Marilyn Warren SC and Justice Mark Weinberg during the appeal process about the differences in sentencing between NSW and Victoria.

Following heavy criticism from the legal profession, the ministers withdrew some of their comments but refused to apologise. They eventually made a full apology late last week, saying they had not intended to influence the court.

The ministers did not deliver their apology personally, but Commonwealth Solicitor-General Stephen Donaghue QC said they apologised unreservedly for the comments. The Court of Appeal decided not to proceed with the contempt of court charges.

The Court of Appeal finalised the CDPP’s appeal last Friday, upgrading Mr Besim’s sentence to 14 years’ imprisonment with a non-parole period of 10-and-a-half years.

Law Council of Australia president Fiona McLeod SC welcomed the ministers’ apology.

“Apologising to the court, and fully retracting earlier comments, was the right thing to do,” she said.

“It shows respect for the separation of powers and the rule of law.

“The apology sends the correct message to the community that the government and the Parliament recognise the importance of our independent judiciary and the fundamental role they play in preserving our democratic freedoms.”

She said it was inappropriate for the ministers to make comments that could influence the judicial process or undermine public confidence in the courts.

“While it is open to anyone to comment on decisions by the courts, it is inappropriate to make comments which can be construed as attempting to influence outcomes of pending decisions, or which tend to undermine public confidence in the judiciary,” she said.

“Our democratic system is grounded on the fundamental doctrine of the separation of powers. The courts exist to provide an important check on executive powers and require absolute independence to perform that role.

“Without this independence, the rule of law may be compromised.”

Speaking at the Law Institute of Victoria on Friday, CJ Warren underscored the importance of the separation between the legal political systems, with particular reference to the role of government lawyers. 

“[Government lawyers] are not part of the political machine,” she said.

“Their obligation is plainly to provide independent and impartial advice to the government of the day and to ministers. 

“Government lawyers are advisers to the government but not part of it. The role is fundamental to the rule of law. While closely associated with government, government lawyers remain fundamentally separate from it and provide the first check on any abuse of executive power.”

The controversy over the three ministers' comments follows Immigration Minister Peter Dutton’s recent attack on the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Ministers court controversy over terrorism sentencing
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Please, Continue (Hamlet), Melbourne Festival
Oct 16 2017
Hamlet suffers slings and arrows of top Victorian barristers
Victorian judges and barristers have performed the unique play Please, Continue (Hamlet) at the Melb...
Julian Assange
Oct 13 2017
When justice fails, according to Assange
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has dismissed the capacity of judicial systems to deal with complex...
Aussie anti-terrorism laws, detention of 10-year-olds
Oct 13 2017
Treatment of kids under Aussie anti-terrorism laws an over-reach: ABA
The Australian Bar Association has urged the government to reconsider proposed reforms to Australian...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...