find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Competition, Policy & Regulatory
Category: Other | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Work with a well regarded Partner · Sydney CBD
View details
Commercial Litigation Senior Associate
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Lawyers Weekly Australia Partner of the Year 2016, Insolvency
View details
MULTIPLEX Regional Legal Counsel (Vic) | 7 to 10 years + PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Career defining in-house role · Tier One international contractor
View details
Junior Lawyer - Personal Injury Law
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Parramatta & Western Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Highly specialized practice · Challenging role with great opportunities
View details
IR Advisor/Member Advocate
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: St Leonards NSW 2065
· Permanent (0.8-1.0 FTE) role in a developing team
View details
Lawyers flailing on ADR

Lawyers flailing on ADR

Lawyers are largely unaware of the process of dispute resolution, and are foiling appropriate resolution of cases as they push them through the court system.

LAWYERS are largely unaware of the process of dispute resolution, and are foiling appropriate resolution of cases as they push them through the court system.

A new report launched this week by the federal Attorney General Robert McClelland has found that alternative dispute resolution remains significantly under-utilised and that a key barrier is a lack of understanding and knowledge among the legal profession, litigants and the general public.

The report, The Resolve to Resolve: Embracing ADR to Improve Access to Justice in the Federal Jurisdiction, makes 39 recommendations aimed at improving the ADR system.

The report’s finding demonstrate that people should not expect “that there is only one just result of every dispute, which only the court can deliver”, said McClelland on Thursday.

McClelland said he plans to urge the various legal professional bodies, including the Law Council of Australia and State and Territory legal bodies, that admission, practising certificates and continuing legal education requirements for lawyers include dispute resolution skills and knowledge.

Lawyers will have to inform their clients about the requirement to take genuine steps to resolve a dispute before commencing court or tribunal proceedings, McClelland said.

Lawyers will have to tell their clients about the likely timeframe of any legal proceedings, the likely costs to them and the other party for which the client may be liable if unsuccessful, and the advantages of resolving their dispute voluntarily, if possible, and the benefits of ADR.

Lawyers will also have to advise their clients about any private or community based services that may help dispute resolution.

As well as an overhaul of how well lawyers are briefed on ADR, McClelland recommended a legislative response requiring prospective litigants to have taken genuine steps to resolve their disputes before they go to court.

They will also have had to considered the services available outside court that may assist them to resolve their disputes, and understand the various ADR processes.

Litigants will also have to have obtained advice about estimated costs, cost exposures and timeframes for the proposed proceedings, McClelland said.

He said debate had developed within the National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council (NADRAC), which published the report, as to whether such legislation should be generally used or contained within specific legislation tailored to the relevant court of tribunal.

McClelland said the government would consult on which action to take and was not yet decided. But, he said, in that respect “the report noted the importance of national consistency”.

New legislation would provide for “pre- and post-filing requirements requiring disputants, legal representatives, courts and tribunals to take genuine steps to resolve disputes, using ADR whenever appropriate”.

McClelland said that if done correctly, new legislation could help avoid some of the “ritualistic procedures that unnecessarily add to costs and delay access to justice rather than assist the quick, fair and effective resolution of disputes”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyers flailing on ADR
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Silk picked to monitor national security laws
Dr James Renwick SC has been appointed as Independent National Security Legislation Monitor after se...
Two businessman, growth
Sep 19 2017
Aus catching up on international arbitration front
Australia is starting to see a spike in international arbitration with this set to continue over the...
Sep 19 2017
Manson family killer suffered ‘miscarriage of justice’: former lawyer
A retired Australian barrister has published a book on the Manson Family murders of 1969 and called ...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...