Overcoming disproportionate interruptions faced by female judges

By Tasha Levy|06 March 2020

Amelia Loughland initially set out to replicate a US study assessing the volume of conservatives interrupting progressive justices. Her study of the High Court of Australia, though, demonstrated quite a different trend.

Ms Loughland joins host Jerome Doraisamy on this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show to unpack the findings of her research paper, “Female Judges, Interrupted”, which suggests that the volume of interruptions faced by female judges on the High Court of Australia far exceeds that of their male counterparts.

She comments on the nature of the interruptions, provides possible explanations for the discrepancy and suggests some potential strategies to help the profession overcome this imbalance.

If you like this episode, show your support by rating us or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts (The Lawyers Weekly Show) and by following Lawyers Weekly on social media: FacebookTwitter and LinkedIn.

If you have any questions about what you heard today, any topics of interest you have in mind, or if you’d like to lend your voice to the show, email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for more insights!

Plus, in case you missed them, check out our most recent episodes:

New obligations under annualised salary changes
• The aftermath of the Lawyer X royal commission
• Lessons in resilience from an Olympian-turned-lawyer

Overcoming disproportionate interruptions faced by female judges
Intro image
lawyersweekly logo


Sexual harassment and convictions in the age of #MeToo

Increase in capital markets activity expected due to COVID-19

Aussie firm acquires boutique practice

Victorian lawyer reprimanded, ordered to pay $3k in installments

Recommended by Spike Native Network